SIR - Our law states that 65 is the age at which an employer tells someone to retire unless they, the employer, has agreed otherwise. Age Concern is mounting a legal challenge to this because it effectively means the continuation of ageism and is clearly against the presumed spirit of the law which is based on equal treatment.
Whether one is in favour of Age Concern's challenge, I would have expected such an issue to be decided upon by our High Court but, of course, that is no longer possible since there is an EU Equal Treatment Directive so the case has been referred to the European Court of Justice.
Not only can we not make our own decisions but it does seem that Age Concern's case will be defeated because the court's lawyer has concluded this week that in a similar case concerning Spanish workers the employer had the power to fix the retirement age at 65 whether the worker likes it or not.
To sum up, our courts won't hear the case and whether we citizens of the UK can work after 65 is likely to be influenced significantly by Spanish labour practices.
Mark Starr, Leigh Sinton
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article