ONE of the most persistent causes of resentment in today's society is the perception that crime not only pays but often goes unpunished, too.

Every offender seems to have a solicitor paid for by the taxpayer who will invariably argue that alcohol or a deprived upbringing is the cause of his client's appalling behaviour.

And even if the case goes badly, then a paltry punishment is meted out - and once again, an ass is made of the law. At least, that's what many law-abiding citizens believe.

All this could change when a ground-breaking scheme is launched by the probation service whereby victims of crime and other residents will be given a say on how offenders pay for their crimes.

Make no mistake, this is pretty radical stuff. But before we get too carried away with forms of retribution that we may feel fit the bill, it is perhaps advisable to remember that legislation exists to regulate forms of punishment such as community service orders.

It will be no good if some of you write in and call for a return of the stocks, ducking stool or public floggings. Neither will any purpose be served by drooling over the notion of scaffolds once more being erected on Worcester's Red Hill or firing squads on Pitchcroft.

No. Those readers who fancy dropping an idea in this particular suggestion box must bear in mind that the paying of any debts to society must be reasonable and in keeping with the 21st Century.