SIR - Having lived in Worcester for more than 30 years, I have with some bemusement followed the latest chapter in the long-running saga of constructing a multi-storey car-park at King Street - the arguments are all so familiar!
However, what adds a totally perplexing dimension this time round are the comments by councillors that the £30,000 would be money well spent because the consultants could prove whether we need this greatly expanded facility. True they could, but before we citizens and ratepayers fly into a rage, or panic, we are assured that all will be well because any increased capacity at King Street will be offset by reductions elsewhere!
So at a huge cost (the consultants fees are but the tip of an enormous financial iceberg) we gain no actual increased car-parking capacity only the loss of amenity to nearby residents, the impact on the views of the Cathedral, a serious loss of archaeological heritage if part is built underground, and increased traffic congestion on Edgar and King Streets.
So unless I have missed something, I suggest councillors reconsider the payment of £30,000 for yet another consultancy report, drop the idea and instead donate the money to any local charity where the money would actually do some good.
DR MALCOLM NIXON,
Worcester.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article