CONTROVERSIAL plans for 400 homes in Alcester may not go ahead.
The town council yesterday received a letter from the Government Inspector in charge of a public inquiry held in October recommending an appeal by developers be turned down.
The inquiry was called after Tanworth builders JS Bloor launched an appeal against Stratford Council's decision to refuse the plans.
Residents and the town council were strongly opposed to the development and reasons given included dangers of flooding, sewerage problems, the risks to wildlife and a huge strain being placed on local services and roads.
A report from the Government Office for the West Midlands sent out yesterday stated: "The Inspector recommended that, in view of the considerations expressed in paragraphs 75-158 of his report, the appeal should be turned down."
It went on to say that because of numerous reasons given, the Secretary of State was minded to agree with the Inspector's recommendation that the plans should not be given the go-ahead.
Town councillor Eric Payne, who gave evidence at the inquiry said: "It's very encouraging that this is the way the Government seems to feel about the plans at the moment.
"This is what the town's people want.
"We feel the town's infrastructure really couldn't cope with this huge development."
A district council spokesman said: "We can confirm we have received notification of an interim decision but until a final decision is made and confirmed, we cannot make further comment."
The Secretary of State did note areas where more inspection was needed and it was asked that any further information regarding these matters should be sent to the Government Office within 28 days.
A public examination of the plans was held in April last year and more than 250 people turned up to express their concerns.
JS Bloor then resubmitted amended plans to Stratford Council in July last year but a further 100 objections were received.
The district council then rejected the plans in September, leading to the October public inquiry when the Government Inspector heard both sides' views.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article