DEAR EDITOR - Councillor Bill Newnes can be forgiven for his confusion regarding the bus pass issue.
This authority had approximately 5,000 qualifying residents entitled to a "free" bus pass and a further 5,000 who, although entitled to one, prefer to opt for a free car park pass.
The policy of Bromsgrove District Council was to offer a choice and no-one was entitled to both passes.
As Cllr Newnes must realise nothing is "free" in this world. In this particular case the cost of providing 5,000 "free" bus passes was £450,000 a year - a payment that was made by the authority to the bus and coach operators in the district who participated in the scheme.
A central government diktat then decreed that all those qualifying must have a concessionary bus pass whether they wanted it or not.
Overnight, the potential number of bus passes had doubled to 10,000 with the respective annual cost increasing from the £450,000 budgeted for, to nearly £1m.
The only sensible choice available to the council was to introduce a half-fare concession in order to keep the total cost to the council taxpayer within the original budgeted figure.
It is a typical example of central Government's int-erference in matters it does not understand.
I believe there were only ten authorities in England which did not have a concessionary fare scheme of sorts.
Instead of the Government concentrating its efforts on those councils it used a 'sledgehammer to crack a nut' to the detriment of those already receiving a better service to the one the Government advocated.
Cllr Nick Psirides,
Leader,
Bromsgrove District Council
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article