MICHAEL Foster has accused one of his constituents of being dim (Evening News, November 10).

This was Peter Luff MP, who had the audacity to question Mr Foster on an issue of Government spending. But, instead of making a polite reply to his constituent, the arrogant city MP preferred to make his reply in his usual sarcastic tones.

For Mr Foster to accuse Peter Luff of being dim is laughable. I would like say that there are several major differences between he and Mr Luff.

First, Peter Luff is a gentleman who is prepared to listen to the concerns of his constituents and act accordingly. Michael Foster is representative of New Labour. Arrogance is their trademark. They appear to be accountable to no one.

TIM PINNEY, Peopleton, Pershore.