An extraordinary planning meeting to discuss the proposed erection of a telecommunications mast at The Hill, Staunton was held by Staunton Parish Council and in addition to councillors about 20 members of the public from the parish were present to show their concern and to ask questions.

Chairman Brian Lewis stated that the parish council wished to collect the views of the parishioners at the meeting to enable them to represent their views to the district council, he also stated that two councillors Luard and Jakeman were unable to attend due to having a prejudiced interest in the proposal to erect a telecommunications mast at The Hill.

Also present was Tom Waldron, acquisition consultant for Adams Holmes Associates, chartered surveyors appointed by Orange for the proposed installation. Orange is one of five telecom operators having a right to operate and have to provide a certain level of coverage. Staunton is one of the holes.

Two sites had been found to be suitable, The Hill and the sewage farm at Pitts Mill. The Hill was the best location for the mast but it is ancient woodland site and important for wildlife.

A 27 metre tower is proposed for The Hill - the trees are 25m to the top of the canopy. Panoramic photos and maps were passed around. Mr Waldron went into the proposal in depth and many questions were put to him by some of those present - would the height of the mast be increased in years to come, would the mast interfere with digital services, will properties be devalued and would there be compensation and there were questions on health and safety, the nearest dwelling being 500m. It was asked if Staunton Church tower could be used and does it have to be Staunton. The answer to the last question was yes, the A417 and a large village population are a factor.

Coun Clive Dent said there was concern for the ancient woodland, it was very unusual and enjoyed by many and Gloucestershire had lost more ancient woodland than any other county in England. The spectrum of wildlife supported by ancient woodland made it very special for the community, he thought it was not a sympathetic choice for the installation. One member of the public felt Mr Waldron had been very fair in his presentation of the facts.