VILLAGERS have been left feeling "disregarded" after plans were approved for over a hundred homes when an application went to appeal.
Residents in Fernhill Heath fought for over a year against what many have called a new estate in Dilmore Lane in Fernhill Heath.
Developers Lioncourt Homes had formally appealed against Wychavon District Council's decision after they rejected the 130-home plan in a meeting in May.
READ MORE: Inside the 'community first' Worcestershire village searching for its 'heart'
"I, along with residents, fought at the appeal for the planning inspector to honour the democratic decision made by Wychavon - they have chosen not to listen," said Wychavon District Councillor Daniel Birch.
"The planning inspector in their report admits that this application will have severe harm on the landscape of the area, essentially admitting it’s wrong.
"However, they chose to overlook this in favour of building more houses.
"We are in no way NIMBYs, but building 130 homes down a country lane that has collectively been described as unsuitable is just wrong.
READ MORE: Resident says they fell into busy A38 road due to overgrown hedges
"Plain and simple."
The council initially refused the plans over increased traffic concerns on narrow roads in Fernhill Heath due to congestion on the A38, which would be outside the village boundary.
However, the planning inspectorate found the land was "not a valued landscape" but the proposal would still "harm the character and appearance of the area".
But after balancing this with the public benefits - 130 new homes - the inspector fell in the developer's favour.
"Collectively, these benefits attract substantial weight in favour of the scheme," the report said.
READ MORE: Fernhill Heath Baptist church group celebrate 50 years of meeting
"My view is that the identified harms do not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the public benefits of the scheme."
The decision was made on Monday, November 25.
Vicky Bilton, from Lioncourt Homes, said the development would reflect the local character of Fernhill Heath and connect to the village.
The development is believed to help make up a housing shortfall of 1,500 homes across the district.
The proposal now also includes land for a village hall, which must be secured through a section 106 agreement.
Cllr Birch added: "The inspectorate has once again disregarded Fernhill Heath, but as a community, we will once again come together and fight for our village."
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel