WORK to create the city's first pump track is set to begin this month.

Preparations at the site at Battenhall Park will begin on Monday, September 23 before installation of the pump track itself takes place on Monday, September 30.

Worcester City Council estimates the project should take four weeks.

Design and build firm Clark & Kent Contractors will carry out the installation.

Worcester city councillor Louis Stephen, who represents Battenhall ward, said: "The pump track has been a polarising issue for the community with many residents fearing it could be a magnet for antisocial behaviour while others are keen to provide an outlet for young people to play."

The pump track, which is designed for standard and adapted bikes, scooters, rollerblades, and skateboards, was given the green light by Worcester City Council's Place and Economic Development Committee in January 2024.

Cllr Stephen added: "Now that the decision has been made we have to make the best of the situation and make it work - I really do hope that the pump track is a success.

"It's really important that any antisocial behaviour like littering and noise is dealt with as quickly as possible to protect local residents living near to the track."


RECOMMENDED READING: Learn more about Worcester's new pump track at drop-in event

RECOMMENDED READING: Battenhall Park BMX pump track gets green light


Cllr Hannah Cooper, vice-chair of the council's Place and Economic Development Committee, said: "The pump track will provide a safe and controlled environment where people of all ages can develop their cycle skills and confidence.

"The facility will also allow people to develop social and life skills with friends.

"The pump track will be similar to those in other parts of Worcestershire which have been very successful."

A consultation was held across October and November 2023 enabling people to give feedback on the proposed plans, with the pump track receiving mixed reviews.

Following the consultation, Worcester City Council's corporate director of operations, homes and communities, Lloyd Griffiths, said: "Although most respondents were supportive, it was clear there was local opposition to it.

"The reasons cited ranged from noise, anti-social behaviour, litter, damage and impact on wildlife and biodiversity."