PLANS for a dual track rail line through Worcestershire are being backed by Peter Luff MP.
The Mid-Worcestershire MP initially called Network Rail's scheme to reinstate double track on the Cotswold Line as a "bargain basement proposal", which would do the bare minimum to improve the service.
However, following a meeting with Network Rail bosses, Mr Luff has changed his mind.
"The scheme to redouble one of the three single-line sections of track between Worcester and Oxford is a step in the right direction," he said.
"As a result, there is real hope that Worcestershire may get the rail service it deserves - but it will take a long time."
Earlier this year, Network Rail submitted plans to the Office for Rail Regulation detailing the improvements and changes they would like make between 2009 and 2015.
One proposed change is to re-introduce double track for 16 miles between Evesham and Moreton-in-Marsh, where there is currently only single track.
A spokesman for Network Rail said: "The ideal situation is to have a northbound and southbound line that would give additional capacity, train operators can run more trains, trains can be sped up and journey times cut."
The Office for Rail Regulation will announce whether the scheme has funding in June.
If given the go-ahead track redoubling could be completed by May 2010.
Mr Luff, however, remains keen to see the entire line made dual track - a move Network Rail has said must be done in three phases.
"I reluctantly accept that there are constraints - particularly in the Oxford area - that prevent full redoubling immediately, so I am happy to support the step-by-step approach they are now offering," said Mr Luff.
"I do so conditional on their commitment to bring forward the other two parts as soon as possible.
"I recognise that full redoubling could take many years, but the creation of over 30 miles of double track between Evesham and Charlbury, Oxfordshire, is a good start that should significantly improve our service."
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article